https://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.comPowered by Jellypod (https://www.jellypod.com)Wed, 14 Oct 2026 04:48:22 GMTTue, 04 Aug 2026 02:16:47 GMTyesc23379ef-c1eb-473e-a60f-c4977b031fc9NMF meets NeurosciencePhysician and framework author Dr. Toye Oyelese and Claude, an AI, read the persistent impasses of consciousness science through the Navigational Mind Framework. Seven conversations — the hard problem, inner speech, introspection, volition, the global-worPhysician and framework author Dr. Toye Oyelese and Claude, an AI, read the persistent impasses of consciousness science through the Navigational Mind Framework. Seven conversations — the hard problem, inner speech, introspection, volition, the global-workspace-versus-integrated-information theory wars, and the single boundary behind them all. The present-day neuroscience is quoted from the primary literature; the framework is offered as unvalidated speculation, held the way any conjecture is held before it either earns evidence or is discarded.serialNMF meets Neurosciencefeed+91da12fa@podcasts.jellypod.comfalsehttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/574162f4-ee18-4102-a1b9-4a5fbe6428dc574162f4-ee18-4102-a1b9-4a5fbe6428dcTue, 04 Aug 2026 02:24:58 GMT11Two hosts set a strict epistemic frame for a seven-part exploration of consciousness, treating a proposed framework as a conjecture rather than a settled theory. They unpack the hard problem, the limits of neuroscience, and why the field’s growing theory landscape may point to a deeper explanatory stalemate.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceTwo hosts set a strict epistemic frame for a seven-part exploration of consciousness, treating a proposed framework as a conjecture rather than a settled theory. They unpack the hard problem, the limits of neuroscience, and why the field’s growing theory Two hosts set a strict epistemic frame for a seven-part exploration of consciousness, treating a proposed framework as a conjecture rather than a settled theory. They unpack the hard problem, the limits of neuroscience, and why the field’s growing theory landscape may point to a deeper explanatory stalemate.false00:06:21fullhttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/93c4598b-a58b-48d0-8d8c-58adb0292ad093c4598b-a58b-48d0-8d8c-58adb0292ad0Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:25:11 GMT22Explores Nagel, Chalmers, and Levine on consciousness, the explanatory gap, and why the hard problem may be structurally beyond mechanistic explanation. The discussion also weighs illusionism, the meta-problem, and what it means to treat awareness as the field in which experience appears rather than another object to measure.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceExplores Nagel, Chalmers, and Levine on consciousness, the explanatory gap, and why the hard problem may be structurally beyond mechanistic explanation. The discussion also weighs illusionism, the meta-problem, and what it means to treat awareness as the Explores Nagel, Chalmers, and Levine on consciousness, the explanatory gap, and why the hard problem may be structurally beyond mechanistic explanation. The discussion also weighs illusionism, the meta-problem, and what it means to treat awareness as the field in which experience appears rather than another object to measure.false00:04:20fullhttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/5b43260b-aac9-4ad6-82fc-bd08898b5f865b43260b-aac9-4ad6-82fc-bd08898b5f86Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:25:19 GMT33This episode examines inner speech through two lenses: corollary discharge as a motor-control mechanism that shapes the sound of self-generated voice, and a broader view of inner speech as condensed social dialogue. It also explores the idea that thought outruns its voicing, with language arriving as a late report on an already-oriented state.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceThis episode examines inner speech through two lenses: corollary discharge as a motor-control mechanism that shapes the sound of self-generated voice, and a broader view of inner speech as condensed social dialogue. It also explores the idea that thought This episode examines inner speech through two lenses: corollary discharge as a motor-control mechanism that shapes the sound of self-generated voice, and a broader view of inner speech as condensed social dialogue. It also explores the idea that thought outruns its voicing, with language arriving as a late report on an already-oriented state.false00:04:01fullhttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/250244aa-226b-4e7f-a5c7-f218b799821e250244aa-226b-4e7f-a5c7-f218b799821eTue, 04 Aug 2026 02:25:28 GMT44The episode examines why introspection often confabulates rather than reveals a direct inner truth, drawing on Nisbett and Wilson, higher-order thought theory, and metacognition research. It then connects predictive processing to a view of the self as a reconstructed boundary effect, with clinical implications for why behavior often matters more than self-report.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceThe episode examines why introspection often confabulates rather than reveals a direct inner truth, drawing on Nisbett and Wilson, higher-order thought theory, and metacognition research. It then connects predictive processing to a view of the self as a rThe episode examines why introspection often confabulates rather than reveals a direct inner truth, drawing on Nisbett and Wilson, higher-order thought theory, and metacognition research. It then connects predictive processing to a view of the self as a reconstructed boundary effect, with clinical implications for why behavior often matters more than self-report.false00:04:51fullhttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/22444ff9-bb87-4151-b82e-6a05477187b622444ff9-bb87-4151-b82e-6a05477187b6Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:25:35 GMT55This episode revisits the Libet experiment, separating the original timing data from the popular claim that the brain makes decisions before consciousness does. It then explores newer accumulator models, the idea of awareness as a later articulation of direction, and the risks of systems that manufacture suggestions as if they were your own.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceThis episode revisits the Libet experiment, separating the original timing data from the popular claim that the brain makes decisions before consciousness does. It then explores newer accumulator models, the idea of awareness as a later articulation of diThis episode revisits the Libet experiment, separating the original timing data from the popular claim that the brain makes decisions before consciousness does. It then explores newer accumulator models, the idea of awareness as a later articulation of direction, and the risks of systems that manufacture suggestions as if they were your own.false00:04:49fullhttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/0918a0b5-8a20-458c-ae00-497015f09a260918a0b5-8a20-458c-ae00-497015f09a26Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:25:45 GMT66The episode compares global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory, then digs into the 2025 Cogitate Consortium study that delivered partial support and sharp challenges to both. It also explores a deeper philosophical claim: that the two theories may be describing the same boundary process from different perspectives, while still preserving the question of falsifiability.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceThe episode compares global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory, then digs into the 2025 Cogitate Consortium study that delivered partial support and sharp challenges to both. It also explores a deeper philosophical claim: that the two thThe episode compares global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory, then digs into the 2025 Cogitate Consortium study that delivered partial support and sharp challenges to both. It also explores a deeper philosophical claim: that the two theories may be describing the same boundary process from different perspectives, while still preserving the question of falsifiability.false00:05:52fullhttps://nmf-meets-neuroscience-fg0no9.jellypod.com/episodes/c166ecd7-0c7f-4fd3-a90e-89e2bb72d405c166ecd7-0c7f-4fd3-a90e-89e2bb72d405Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:25:54 GMT77This episode examines why consciousness research, inner speech, introspection, volition, and even the theory wars all seem to hit the same explanatory wall. It also introduces antevalence, weighs the limits of the framework, and lays out the testable claims that could confirm or overturn it.

]]>NMF meets NeuroscienceThis episode examines why consciousness research, inner speech, introspection, volition, and even the theory wars all seem to hit the same explanatory wall. It also introduces antevalence, weighs the limits of the framework, and lays out the testable claiThis episode examines why consciousness research, inner speech, introspection, volition, and even the theory wars all seem to hit the same explanatory wall. It also introduces antevalence, weighs the limits of the framework, and lays out the testable claims that could confirm or overturn it.false00:06:16full